<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The whole GNOME and Mono and Java thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193</link>
	<description>...in which occasional posts describe occasionally boring things</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hans Poo</title>
		<link>http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Poo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alledora.co.uk/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I think it's a very good article, i've been thinking the same things last few time. The comments above mine are of mercenaries who don't care about opensource, nor they know. Of course we can't trust java neither .net. M$ is just following their primary idea of decomoditizing protocols as the halloween documents said, when they develop .net they said something like: "java has kept sun in the game, we must build our own language for domination". I think parrot is the way or some other kind of 100% opensource platform. Just consider current allianzes between sun and M$ and the demand against ibm from M$ trying to damage linux and opensource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a very good article, i&#8217;ve been thinking the same things last few time. The comments above mine are of mercenaries who don&#8217;t care about opensource, nor they know. Of course we can&#8217;t trust java neither .net. M$ is just following their primary idea of decomoditizing protocols as the halloween documents said, when they develop .net they said something like: &#8220;java has kept sun in the game, we must build our own language for domination&#8221;. I think parrot is the way or some other kind of 100% opensource platform. Just consider current allianzes between sun and M$ and the demand against ibm from M$ trying to damage linux and opensource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Bobo</title>
		<link>http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alledora.co.uk/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I hope you are joking. I just took a look at Parrot, and it sucks. It feels like Assembly having sex with Basic. It is terrible.

Really, I don't see any programmers migrating to anything like that. Python is a better alternative, but this strong-typeness it has pisses me off each time I have to hack some apps to get them run on newer versions.

I admit that I haven't looked at Perl 6, but if it is anything remotely similar to the current Perl and it doesn't have a compiler version, I don't see it catching up either.

So, that brings us back to Java and C# (with Python, Objective-C and C++ as underdogs). Personally, I would go for C# (much better than Java). Just don't implement the non-ECMA stuff so you can be safe from MS' laywers (or implement new stuff, even if incompatible to MS' .NET).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I hope you are joking. I just took a look at Parrot, and it sucks. It feels like Assembly having sex with Basic. It is terrible.</p>
<p>Really, I don&#8217;t see any programmers migrating to anything like that. Python is a better alternative, but this strong-typeness it has pisses me off each time I have to hack some apps to get them run on newer versions.</p>
<p>I admit that I haven&#8217;t looked at Perl 6, but if it is anything remotely similar to the current Perl and it doesn&#8217;t have a compiler version, I don&#8217;t see it catching up either.</p>
<p>So, that brings us back to Java and C# (with Python, Objective-C and C++ as underdogs). Personally, I would go for C# (much better than Java). Just don&#8217;t implement the non-ECMA stuff so you can be safe from <span class="caps">MS&#8217; </span>laywers (or implement new stuff, even if incompatible to <span class="caps">MS&#8217;</span> .NET).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Bobo</title>
		<link>http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alledora.co.uk/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-236</guid>
		<description>BTW, regarding Parrot, they have that example on their site where the C code is about 6 lines of code and the Parrot one is about 35. They even have the guts to present that example. Yuk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">BTW, </span>regarding Parrot, they have that example on their site where the C code is about 6 lines of code and the Parrot one is about 35. They even have the guts to present that example. Yuk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaW</title>
		<link>http://alledora.co.uk/wordpress/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>MaW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alledora.co.uk/archives/2004/05/20/193#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Coding in Parrot would be like coding in the .NET IL. Parrot is a language for compilers to target, not for humans to write directly (unless they're bootstrapping compilers that run on Parrot, of course).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coding in Parrot would be like coding in the .NET <span class="caps">IL.</span> Parrot is a language for compilers to target, not for humans to write directly (unless they&#8217;re bootstrapping compilers that run on Parrot, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
