Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
I have just seen the film. This entry comprises a spoiler-filled review of it. If you do not know the plot, do not read on. Go and read the book instead.
If you have not seen the film and are intending to go, I strongly recommend that you also go and read the book instead. Especially if you have read the book already, or have any interest in continuity or internal consistency.
Now, read on for the rest of it. I say again, the following is filled with spoilers.
Okay so I’ll admit I was excited to go and see the film. New director, a chance to make up for the mistakes of the first two films and really show the world of Harry Potter in the truest way possible.
Needless to say I should have known it was too good a hope to actually be fulfilled.
It begins with a very pretty variation on the Warner Brothers logo. Nice. Classy. The familiar music. Then some weird pulsing noise, and a flashing light to go with it. Harry, it appears, is attempting to learn a spell to make lots of light (Lumos Maximus, unsurprisingly enough) under the sheets in his bedroom at the Dursley’s house. One wonders why he can get away with this, when the second book and film showed us that a house elf using a Hover charm nearly gets Harry expelled. This is especially bad as Harry mentions later whilst talking to Fudge that it’s illegal for him to use magic at home.
Move on to the arrival of Aunt Marge. Harry losing his temper and the shattering wine glass was very well done I’ll admit, but then the actual inflation of Marge was far too comic to be acceptable — NOT helped by the score, which was far below the standard of the previous two films. This one’s supposed to be much darker than the previous two, not a parody of them.
And even when Aunt Marge floats away into the sky (a minor plot modification), no owls arrive. Harry storms out of the house of course, sees Sirius the dog (after a totally unnecessary and completely pointless and stupid little windstorm), nearly gets killed by the Knight Bus and then we’re treated to scenes of it rushing around the country to some hideous soundtrack that really makes you wonder if you’ve accidentally started watching the Keystone Kops.
Harry also didn’t see Sirius Black on the Muggle news. He finds out about him from the paper on the bus, as is expected, but nobody mentions the whole killed thirteen people with one curse thing. Which I would have thought is rather important. Stan Shaunpike also not a particularly well-realised character, and the bus driver and that ridiculous talking head… well, I won’t say any more.
Fudge was moderately well done. That was okay, but Harry didn’t stay a couple of weeks in Diagon Alley; conveniently it was the day before he had to go back to Hogwarts anyway. That smelled of contrivance.
Also, why did Mr. Weasley take Harry aside to tell him about Black being after him? Harry is supposed to overhear that, although admittedly Mr. Weasley tries to tell him later on, I think overhearing would have been a better presentation of it.
Oh, and the Leaky Cauldron’s rooms are supposed to be comfortable, not dusty, noisy and horrible.
And now we come to the Dementors. Oh the Dementors. Why did they feel it was necessary to make them capable of flight? Aren’t they scary enough as it is? And why were their mouths frequently visible, when a whole part of the Dementor thing is that nobody knows what’s under the hood, except those who’ve fallen victim to the Dementor’s Kiss?
Lupin didn’t put in a good performance on the train either. He woke up, bounced into action and performed the Patronus charm just a little too conveniently for my liking. Not to mention that he’s supposed to wake up when the train stops, not when Harry’s just passing out. That strikes me as a pointless modification.
Another modification that was exceptionally irritating was the school choir. Firstly, although I’m sure Hogwarts has one, we do not see it in any of the first five books. Secondly, they were single ‘double double toil and trouble, fire burn and cauldron bubble’ and so forth. Hello? People with brains here? That is in no way what they would sing at Hogwarts, I am sure.
I also suspect that even if they did sing it, they wouldn’t sound like professionally-trained singers whilst doing so. Or is there a charm for improving one’s singing voice? The accompaniment by giant toads was interesting, but given that the whole bit was unnecessary, I’d have much preferred to hear the school song which they missed out of the first film.
Dawn French put in a good performance as the Fat Lady, and was so good that I’m willing to accept the slight modification to her, as it did no harm to the plot, and might have been good in the book itself, in fact, although perhaps works better as a visual joke.
All the school uniforms look scruffier in this film, which is more realistic. Shirts untucked, ties in a mess and so on, which is pretty good all told. We should not, however, EVER see the chain Hermione’s wearing around her neck with the Time Turner on it, or the little hints they kept dropping that she was appearing out of nowhere. In the book she’s much cleverer than that at keeping people from noticing what she was doing.
The Maurauder’s Map was pretty. Changing the little dots to footprints was actually a nice touch. I liked that.
What I did not like is what they did with it. Harry is looking at it one night with the most visually impressive Lumos charm (the one that makes the tip of your wand glow), when he sees Peter Pettigrew on it. Now it is perhaps an oversight in the books that he didn’t show up on it before, as we know he was in the grounds all the time and the map’s supposed to cover all of them. I thought for a while that it was also an oversight in the fourth book when it didn’t show Mad-Eye Moody as Bartemious Crouch all the time, but then I realised that Polyjuice Potion must fool it, and we only see him as Crouch on the map when he’s stealing potion ingredients to make more. But enough of the fourth book.
Now Lupin recognises the map instantly, but not only does Harry fail to ask how, Lupin also fails to mention that he wrote it along with Harry’s father (and Peter Pettigrew and Sirius Black of course). This started off a long bit of total lack of regard for most of the backstory, which meant that large parts of the rest of the film changed, and not much of it made any sense anymore.
Harry doesn’t see Sirius at the Quidditch match, he sees a dog shape in the clouds before flying Dementors start assaulting him. The Firebolt doesn’t turn up until the end, after they know Sirius is innocent, and has a single Hippogriff feather packed with it so they know who sent it. The second Quidditch match doesn’t happen at all.
Buckbeak’s trial and execution came out of nowhere, although Hagrid’s suit and tie were quite as awful as expected. The execution was overdone — we see a really slow shot of MacNair raising his axe and swinging it down, far too overblown… would’ve been better to only show what they see in the book, which is nothing at all, they just hear the sound of the axe falling and assume the worst.
The Shrieking Shack happened too quickly. I shall say no more about the plot changes here, as they were implied by the earlier ones anyway.
The werewolf didn’t look enough like a wolf. I got the impression from the book that it’s supposed to be hard to tell them apart, yet this one looked like a hairy person. Think a CG version of the werewolves on Buffy and you might come close.
Sirius in dog form keeping Lupin in wolf form away from the children was nicely animated.
The proper Patronus charm which saves Harry from the Dementors took far too long and wasn’t right. The stag barely featured, but I suppose without all the animagus backstory, it would have been mildly inexplicable. Which it was really, as it was still shown for a while, although the Dementors were repelled by pulses of light, not by the stag charging them.
Harry and Hermione’s rescue of Sirius and Buckbeak was close enough. It fitted in with the rest of the film, I suppose. Why move Sirius from the Charms classroom to a prison cell on top of a tower? Why would Hogwarts have prison cells? And if it did, wouldn’t they be in the dungeons? The top of a tower is far too convenient a place for rescue by Hippogriff.
And as a final point, the director appears to have a fondness for the camera following falling leaves, feathers, petals, birds or indeed anything else that moves downwards at a moderate kind of pace and can be followed by the camera (whether real or computer generated) from one scene to another.
Oh, and why does everything freeze when the Dementors come past? That’s supposed to be a metaphor.
Oliver Wood, Alicia Spinnet, Angelina Johnson and Katie Bell were all nowhere to be seen except as brief glimpses during the Quidditch match.
Why does the Snitch always taunt the Seekers in the film? It deliberately hovers in front of their faces then runs away, rather than waiting to be spotted. Maybe it didn’t like the weather either.
Okay, I really am going to stop now. Just don’t go and see it.
You scare me.
Comment by clc — Wednesday, 2nd June 2004 @ 12:07
Excellent.
(cue best Mr. Burns impression)
Comment by MaW — Wednesday, 2nd June 2004 @ 12:20
I went to see it because I thought Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind was on, but I was wrong, so ended up seeing this with Lizzy instead.
Just a few brief comments from someone that hasn’t read the books (although I might do this summer since people do seem to love them so). Oh, and I’ve only seen the first film, but remember very little of it.
- I thought most of the acting was appalling - especially the 3 leads. Fair enough, they’re young actors, but their acting was distinctly naff. The adults acted better, but Gary Oldman wasn’t given very good lines to say, so his talents didn’t show through. Of course Alan Rickman was good, but I think being dark and potentially evil is a relatively easy part to act.
- I thought the story line was too shallow - with no subtleties in it, only things you needed to know. And they kept making parts of the plot progression very obvious. I hated the “Oh, I overheard that only a really powerful magician could do that” line along with various others of that ilk… just made the whole thing feel like a film for 6 year-olds who need it all on a plate for them.
- The story seemed to move too quickly, despite the showing of the passing of seasons with that tree thing, it still felt like the whole thing took a week to happen, not a year.
- I quite liked some of the camera techniques - flying through the clock tower, following birds and stuff, but I agree it was over-done and pointless at some points.
Anyway, I think that’ll do for me.
Comment by x3ja — Friday, 4th June 2004 @ 10:56
This of course is a problem with the book having to be cut down to fit it into a film - most of what they cut was backstory and explanation. It makes a lot more sense in the book, and time is very much shown as well, as you get to see Christmas (which they more or less ignored in the film) and Easter, three Quidditch matches, more than one Care of Magical Creatures lesson, a Transfiguration class where they are told what an Animagus is… there’s a fairly important part of the plot really - all Animagi have to be registered with the Ministry of Magic, including what animal they turn into and what their markings are. The whole thing with nobody knowing Sirius was an Animagus hinges on that, as he became an unregistered Animagus whilst at school - along with Peter Pettigrew (which is why nobody knew about him either) and James Potter. Who became a stag, hence Harry’s Patronus takes the shape of a stag. And they did it so that when Lupin turned into a werewolf, they could go out with him and have fun.
I’ll stop ranting now.
Comment by MaW — Friday, 4th June 2004 @ 11:17